Skip to content
Search

What ‘Bad Art Friend’ Can Teach Us About the ‘Baby Reindeer’ Controversy

What ‘Bad Art Friend’ Can Teach Us About the ‘Baby Reindeer’ Controversy

In 2021, The New York Times Magazine published a nearly-10,000-word feature titled “Who Is the Bad Art Friend?” The piece was about a woman named Dawn Dorland, who donated a kidney to a stranger, which she posted about at length in a Facebook group for aspiring writers. Another member of the group, Sonya Larson, wrote a short story inspired by Dorland, prompting an enraged Dorland to sue. 

When “Who Is the Bad Art Friend?” was published, it prompted a massive online debate. Some sided with Dorland, arguing that Larson had betrayed her trust; others sided with Larson, claiming that seeking inspiration from real life is the marrow of great fiction. At the heart of the discourse was the central question: In a world where consent and privacy are ostensibly paramount, how do those principles translate to art? Does it make you a “bad art friend” to seek inspiration from those around you, or does it make you simply an artist? Another way of putting it: What is the role of empathy in art?


Three years later, we seem to be more confused about the topic than ever. This is evident from the discourse sparked by Baby Reindeer, the acclaimed Netflix limited series about a comedian, Donny Dunn (Richard Gadd), being stalked by an older woman, Martha Scott (Jessica Gunning). 

As a work of art, Baby Reindeer is deeply moving. It is also profoundly uncomfortable to watch. Partly that’s because the show deftly questions long-held orthodoxies about sexual abuse, mental health, and gender identity — in particular, suggesting that the line between victim and abuser is far more tenuous (or even blurry) than we’d like to believe. But it’s also because from the very start, via an onscreen message, we are told that “this is a true story.”  

When Baby Reindeer started airing, internet sleuths predictably set to work trying to identify the real-life inspiration for Martha, despite Gadd’s request on social media that they not. Within days, they pointed to Fiona Harvey, a middle-aged lawyer who’d tweeted excessively at Gadd around the same period the show is set in. 

Much like Dorland, who did not enjoy being publicly skewered, Harvey was enraged by the character of Martha. In interviews, she claimed that Gadd had fabricated or exaggerated most of the series — particularly the fact that Martha was eventually jailed for her actions — and threatened to sue him. (On June 6, Harvey filed a ­multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against Netflix; neither Gadd nor Netflix have responded to her claims or confirmed she was the inspiration for Martha.) In short, she accused Gadd of being a bad art friend. 

Gunning as Martha

Though Gadd certainly could have obscured some of the identifying details in Baby Reindeer, it’s hard to argue that he didn’t have the right to tell his own story as he experienced it, whether or not it coincides with the version of events put forth by his source of inspiration. While it may make us squirm to watch Donny Dunn masturbate over the thought of having sex with his stalker, the truth is often uncomfortable, and the complex feelings Gadd had for his alleged stalker are no exception. Indeed, part of what makes Baby Reindeer such a remarkable piece of art is how Gadd extends so much more understanding to his abuser than she arguably deserves. 

For all the buzzwords that people reared on the internet use to preach the language of empathy — the importance of respecting boundaries, of not platforming abusers, of amplifying marginalized voices and silencing those who misuse their power — we’re awfully quick to attack when a video goes viral of someone losing their shit on an airplane or yelling at a Target employee. What matters to the online mob in these moments is not, it seems, whether a person is mentally ill or neurodivergent or in the throes of a personal crisis or just having a bad day. What matters is finding out who they are and making sure they are held accountable for their bad behavior, even though what accountability looks like changes on any given day. What matters is declaring a good guy and a bad guy, where both of these roles are obvious and unchanging. 

On the surface, Baby Reindeer may not seem so kind to Martha. But this is a shallow reading of the character. Though Martha is messy, violent, irrational, and occasionally bigoted, she also has moments of genuine charm and vivaciousness, as well as flashes of insight into other people’s lives. “Someone hurt you, didn’t they?” she remarks to Donny, not knowing how accurate she is. Even though she does incalculable harm to people throughout the series, Gadd never fails to remind us of her humanity. It is a nuanced portrayal — one that would not have been possible without Gadd having genuine empathy for the real woman he was writing about. 

It’s ironic, then, that the discourse around this show has centered on demonizing a fiction writer for exercising precisely the level of empathy that most people on the internet lack. It takes integrity to look at the person who’s made your life a living hell and try to find something redeemable in her, something that could help to account for, if not justify, why she became who she is. And it takes courage to share your process of recovery with the rest of the world. We can blame Richard Gadd for cutting corners in not changing certain key details, but we can’t blame him for failing to consider the real-life Martha’s feelings in the process of telling his own story — and hers. He’s not the bad art friend; we are.

More Stories

Can the Best of Star Wars Survive the Worst of Its Fans?

Can the Best of Star Wars Survive the Worst of Its Fans?

When George Lucas debuted his science fiction epic about a galaxy far far away in 1977, Star Wars went from a long-shot space opera into the highest grossing science fiction franchise of all time. Almost 50 years and one sale to entertainment conglomerate Disney later, Star Wars isn’t just a one-off world. There have been prequels, reboots, stand-alone television series, and an in-depth theme park addition. But like most popular culture, the Star Wars fandom, especially online, has become inundated with loud, conservative, and in some cases, incredibly racist voices. While Disney has never said these voices are directly impacting what shows get made, the vocal minority of Star Wars devotees keep limiting what they’ll accept as true Star Wars. These fans say they’re fighting for Star Wars’ future. But if their endless fantasy world can’t accept any stories that they don’t recognize — some of the self-professed biggest fans in all the worlds could be closing themselves off to any future at all. What is crystal (kyber?) clear is that before Star Wars can have another successful show, the loudest voices online need to realize the Star Wars they want to return to never existed in the first place. Will the real Star Wars please stand up? 

Much of the online discourse around Star Wars has centered on the franchise’s most recent live action projects. First premiering in 2019, these include The MandalorianThe Book of Boba Fett,Ahsoka, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Andor, and The Acolyte. The market has been oversaturated with stories, especially many that occur within the same time frames, with fans frankly, getting tired and in some cases — outright bored. Each of the projects has had its own reception — and own problems. However the low audience scores, angry YouTube rants, and long Reddit threads can really boil down to one question: who determines what’s real Star Wars? First as a film, and then a trilogy, Star Wars established early on to viewers that even when they were focused on a set of powerful twins and a dark Empire, shit was going down on literally every other planet. This freedom has allowed for endless story arcs across decades. But while opportunities have been endless — the patience of fans hasn’t. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Sabrina Carpenter Is Viscously Clever and Done With Love Triangles on ‘Short N’ Sweet’: 5 Takeaways

Sabrina Carpenter Is Viscously Clever and Done With Love Triangles on ‘Short N’ Sweet’: 5 Takeaways

After Sabrina Carpenter’s summer takeover with “Espresso” and “Please Please Please,” the anticipation for Short n’ Sweet was at an all-time high. On her sixth album, the pop singer keeps the surprises coming as she delivers a masterclass in clever songwriting and hops between R&B and folk-pop with ease. Carpenter writes about the frustration of modern-day romance, all the while cementing herself as a pop classic. Here’s everything we gathered from the new project.

Please Please Please Don’t Underestimate Her Humor

Carpenter gave us a glimpse of her humor on singles “Espresso” and “Please Please Please” — she’s working late because she’s a singer; ceiling fans are a pretty great invention! But no one could have guessed how downright hilarious she is on Short n’ Sweet, delivering sugary quips like “The Lord forgot my gay awakenin’” (“Slim Pickins”) and “How’s the weather in your mother’s basement?” (“Needless to Say”). She’s also adorably nerdy, fretting about grammar (“This boy doesn’t even know/The difference between ‘there,’ ‘their’ and ‘they are!’”) and getting Shakespearian (“Where art thou? Why not uponeth me?”). On “Juno,” she even takes a subject as serious as pregnancy and twists it into a charming pop culture reference for the ages: “If you love me right, then who knows?/I might let you make me Juno.” It’s official: Do not underestimate Ms. Carpenter’s pen. — A.M.

Keep ReadingShow less
RFK Jr. Suspends Campaign, Endorses Trump

RFK Jr. Suspends Campaign, Endorses Trump

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has suspended his 2024 presidential campaign, and according to a court filing in Pennsylvania on Friday will throw his weight behind former President Donald Trump.

Multiple news outlets reported on Wednesday that independent presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. was planning to drop out of the race and endorse Trump. He clarified at an event in Arizona on Friday that he is not terminating his campaign, only suspending it, and that his name will remain on the ballot in non-battleground states. He said that if enough people still vote for him and Trump and Kamala Harris tie in the Electoral College, he could still wind up in the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Chicks’ ‘Not Ready to Make Nice’ Has Somehow Become a MAGA Anthem on TikTok

The Chicks’ ‘Not Ready to Make Nice’ Has Somehow Become a MAGA Anthem on TikTok

One little funny/bizarre/horrifying thing about the internet is the way it offers up everything and, in doing so, makes it possible to strip anything of its history. But to paraphrase Kamala Harris, you didn’t just fall out of the coconut tree. “You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you” — wise words worth heeding, especially for all the Trump voters and conservatives making TikToks with the Chicks’ “Not Ready to Make Nice.”

Over the past month or so, “Not Ready to Make Nice” has become an unexpected MAGA anthem of sorts, meant to express a certain rage at liberals supposedly telling conservatives what to do all the time (the past few Supreme Court terms notwithstanding, apparently). Young women especially have taken the song as a way to push back against the possibility of Harris becoming the first female president. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Sabrina Carpenter, Myke Towers, Cash Cobain, and All the Songs You Need to Know This Week

Sabrina Carpenter, Myke Towers, Cash Cobain, and All the Songs You Need to Know This Week

Welcome to our weekly rundown of the best new music — featuring big new singles, key tracks from our favorite albums, and more. This week, Sabrina Carpenter delivers her long-awaited debut Short ‘n Sweet, Myke Towers switches lanes with the help of Peso Pluma, and Cash Cobain moves drill music forward with a crossover hit. Plus, new music from Lainey Wilson, Blink182, and Coldplay.

Sabrina Carpenter, ‘Taste” (YouTube)

Keep ReadingShow less