Skip to content
Search

‘Made in England’ Is Martin Scorsese’s Love Letter to British Movies

‘Made in England’ Is Martin Scorsese’s Love Letter to British Movies

Martin Scorsese is recognized as a champion of cinema, a man who’s dedicated his life to preserving the seventh art, the former model for the single most 1970s beard ever and our greatest living American filmmaker. What folks usually forget to mention is that the 81-year-old director is also our nation’s unofficial film-history-professor laureate, and his side hustle as both a documentarian and talking-head-for-hire has occasionally allowed Scorsese to share his knowledge, his insights and most of all, his passion for movies from every era and all corners of the world. Sometimes it’s in the slightly diaristic form of a “personal journey,” sometimes it’s simply offering a testimonial or the equivalent of a guest lecture in someone else’s lesson. Get the gent talking about the moving pictures in any way, shape or form, however, and the result always tends to fall between mind-expanding and mind-blowing.

Scorsese didn’t direct Made in England — that credit goes to the BAFTA-winning British docmaker David Hinton — but he’s the narrator, tour guide and overall overwhelming presence of this deep dive into the work of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, the filmmaking duo known as “the Archers.” Scorsese has a personal connection to their work on several levels, starting with a youth spent watching the Million Dollar Movie program most afternoons; as he points out early on, American studios were reluctant to license their output to TV since that box in living rooms was considered the competition, but the distributors of British films had no such qualms. Hence, Scorsese ended up seeing a lot of imports from the U.K. in his formative years, courtesy of such Brit-cinema production stalwarts as the Rank Organization and Gainsborough.


It was the work of Powell and Pressburger’s Archers company, however, that left the biggest mark on him. And if you’ve seen The Red Shoes, Black Narcissus, The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp — or really, any of the dozen or so projects the duo collaborated on together — you can understand why. Made in England‘s opening montage alone, in a which a greatest-hits reel of Powell & Pressburger classics offers brief samples of their cinematic brio, is enough to make you punch drunk on their sheer movie-movieness. The black and white films could be poetic or picturesque, but were never pulpy. The color films took on the vibrancy and hallucinogenic qualities of a dream. Scorsese attests to the fact that seeing (and re-seeing, and re-re-seeing) those films changed him as both a moviegoer and a moviemaker. Should you think he’s merely paying lip service to a personal hero, the doc runs side-by-side shots of The Red Shoes and Taxi Driver, followed by a litany of Archers-style close-ups from Goodfellas, Cape Fear, The Age of Innocence, etc., that seal the deal. The latter is set to Cream’s “Sunshine of Your Love,” which begs the question: So are you sure Scorsese didn’t actually direct this himself?

The fact that most of us even know the names Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger can be attributed directly to Scorsese, who almost singlehandedly forced their work back into the consciousness of tastemakers and film nerds. By the time the Mean Streets director sought Powell out during a trip to London in the early 1970s, the Archers work had largely been dismissed or outright forgotten. When the team broke up in 1957, Powell went off and made 1960’s Peeping Tom — a lurid story of a film-obsessed young man who murders people in order to shoot their final moments. Now, it plays like a companion piece to the similarly pathological Psycho, which hits screens the same year. Then, it was considered the work of a sicko, and made Powell persona non grata in the industry for years. He made the occasional movie after that, and briefly reunited with Pressburger at the end of the decade. But when the younger filmmaker met him, the elder statesman had more or less given up.

So Made in England is partially about how Scorsese managed to first befriend this artist he so greatly admired, and then rescue him from obscurity — a series of screenings and restorations of the Archers’ work, much of which Scorsese oversaw during the ’70s and ’80s, had completely reintroduced cinephiles to what is truly a glorious, delirious back catalog of films. Along with Francis Ford Coppola, who’d hire Powell to be an artist-in-residence during the brief heyday of Zoetrope Studios in the early 1980s, Scorsese made sure that attention was paid to this great man and that The Red Shoes and several other key works were recognized as modern masterpieces. He’d also introduce Powell to his longtime editor Thelma Schoonmaker; she and Powell married in 1984 and were together until his death in 1990.

But the documentary is also a masterclass on the movies themselves, with Professor Scorsese breaking down individual scenes, walking viewers through formalistic experiments and characters’ psychological motivations, and explaining how the two Archers met, often embedding behind-the-scenes anecdotes when pertinent and offering big-picture context when necessary. If you’re coming to Powell and Pressburger’s work for the first time, you’ll leave a believer. If you’ve already been converted thanks to constantly circulating prints/DCPs and/or weekend-long binges on the Criterion Channel, you’ll emerge as a second-hand scholar regarding their work.

And if you love their films as much as Scorsese still does — a virtual impossibility, given his alpha fandom — you’ll feel that, like David Niven in A Matter of Life and Death, you’ve briefly entered the kingdom of heaven. Made in England is currently playing in New York, hits several more cities on July 26th and expands even wider on August 2nd. Be warned that it is a gateway drug. It’s also the sort of movie that makes you understand why people fall in love with movies in the first place.

More Stories

Can the Best of Star Wars Survive the Worst of Its Fans?

Can the Best of Star Wars Survive the Worst of Its Fans?

When George Lucas debuted his science fiction epic about a galaxy far far away in 1977, Star Wars went from a long-shot space opera into the highest grossing science fiction franchise of all time. Almost 50 years and one sale to entertainment conglomerate Disney later, Star Wars isn’t just a one-off world. There have been prequels, reboots, stand-alone television series, and an in-depth theme park addition. But like most popular culture, the Star Wars fandom, especially online, has become inundated with loud, conservative, and in some cases, incredibly racist voices. While Disney has never said these voices are directly impacting what shows get made, the vocal minority of Star Wars devotees keep limiting what they’ll accept as true Star Wars. These fans say they’re fighting for Star Wars’ future. But if their endless fantasy world can’t accept any stories that they don’t recognize — some of the self-professed biggest fans in all the worlds could be closing themselves off to any future at all. What is crystal (kyber?) clear is that before Star Wars can have another successful show, the loudest voices online need to realize the Star Wars they want to return to never existed in the first place. Will the real Star Wars please stand up? 

Much of the online discourse around Star Wars has centered on the franchise’s most recent live action projects. First premiering in 2019, these include The MandalorianThe Book of Boba Fett, Ahsoka, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Andor, and The Acolyte. The market has been oversaturated with stories, especially many that occur within the same time frames, with fans frankly, getting tired and in some cases — outright bored. Each of the projects has had its own reception — and own problems. However the low audience scores, angry YouTube rants, and long Reddit threads can really boil down to one question: who determines what’s real Star Wars? First as a film, and then a trilogy, Star Wars established early on to viewers that even when they were focused on a set of powerful twins and a dark Empire, shit was going down on literally every other planet. This freedom has allowed for endless story arcs across decades. But while opportunities have been endless — the patience of fans hasn’t. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

One of the odder features of American journalism is that the columnists who hold themselves out as “fact checkers” and review claims made by politicians — calling balls, strikes, and “pinocchios” — are unusually terrible at it.

Fact checkers offered up several botched reviews of content from the Democratic National Convention, but nothing has broken their brains like Democrats’ sustained attacks on Donald Trump over Republicans’ anti-abortion agenda, which is laid out in gory detail in conservatives’ Project 2025 policy roadmap. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Cops Who Falsified Warrant Used in Breonna Taylor Raid Didn’t Cause Her Death, Judge Rules

Cops Who Falsified Warrant Used in Breonna Taylor Raid Didn’t Cause Her Death, Judge Rules

A federal judge in Kentucky ruled that two police officers accused of falsifying a warrant ahead of the deadly raid that killed Breonna Taylor were not responsible for her death, The Associated Press reports. And rather than the phony warrant, U.S. District Judge Charles Simpson said Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, was responsible for her death because he fired upon the police officers first — even though he had no idea they were police officers.

The ruling was handed down earlier this week in the civil rights violation case against former Louisville Police Detective Joshua Jaynes and former Sgt. Kyle Meany. The two were not present at the March 2020 raid when Taylor was killed. Instead, in 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland accused the pair (along with another detective, Kelly Goodlett) of submitting a false affidavit to search Taylor’s home before the raid and then conspiring to create a “false cover story… to escape responsibility” for preparing the phony warrant. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Queens of the Stone Age Cancel Remaining 2024 Shows After Josh Homme Surgery

Queens of the Stone Age Cancel Remaining 2024 Shows After Josh Homme Surgery

Queens of the Stone Age have canceled the remainder of their 2024 tour dates — including a string of North American shows and festival gigs scheduled for the fall — as Josh Homme continues his recovery from an unspecified surgery he underwent in July.

“QOTSA regret to announce the cancellation and/or postponement of all remaining 2024 shows. Josh has been given no choice but to prioritize his health and to receive essential medical care through the remainder of the year,” the band wrote on social media.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sabrina Carpenter Is Viscously Clever and Done With Love Triangles on ‘Short N’ Sweet’: 5 Takeaways

Sabrina Carpenter Is Viscously Clever and Done With Love Triangles on ‘Short N’ Sweet’: 5 Takeaways

After Sabrina Carpenter’s summer takeover with “Espresso” and “Please Please Please,” the anticipation for Short n’ Sweet was at an all-time high. On her sixth album, the pop singer keeps the surprises coming as she delivers a masterclass in clever songwriting and hops between R&B and folk-pop with ease. Carpenter writes about the frustration of modern-day romance, all the while cementing herself as a pop classic. Here’s everything we gathered from the new project.

Please Please Please Don’t Underestimate Her Humor

Carpenter gave us a glimpse of her humor on singles “Espresso” and “Please Please Please” — she’s working late because she’s a singer; ceiling fans are a pretty great invention! But no one could have guessed how downright hilarious she is on Short n’ Sweet, delivering sugary quips like “The Lord forgot my gay awakenin’” (“Slim Pickins”) and “How’s the weather in your mother’s basement?” (“Needless to Say”). She’s also adorably nerdy, fretting about grammar (“This boy doesn’t even know/The difference between ‘there,’ ‘their’ and ‘they are!’”) and getting Shakespearian (“Where art thou? Why not uponeth me?”). On “Juno,” she even takes a subject as serious as pregnancy and twists it into a charming pop culture reference for the ages: “If you love me right, then who knows?/I might let you make me Juno.” It’s official: Do not underestimate Ms. Carpenter’s pen. — A.M.

Keep ReadingShow less