Skip to content
Search

Ariana Madix Wants Out of Raquel Leviss ‘Revenge Porn’ Lawsuit, Denies Sharing Video

Ariana Madix Wants Out of Raquel Leviss ‘Revenge Porn’ Lawsuit, Denies Sharing Video

Vanderpump Rules star Ariana Madix is adamant she never shared the “intimate” video of Raquel Leviss that she copied from her former boyfriend Tom Sandoval’s phone, so she’s asking a judge to release her from the revenge porn lawsuit that Leviss filed against Madix and Sandoval in February.

In new court filings obtained by Rolling Stone, Madix says she only sent snippets of the NSFW video directly to Leviss the night she discovered the recording because she was upset and wanted to confront her VPR co-star over the alleged affair that became the cultural phenomenon known as “Scandoval.”


“I did not send the videos to anyone else. Nor did I share, display, or show the videos to anyone else,” Madix wrote in a sworn declaration filed late Friday with her motion to strike the claims against her. She recalled sending the videos with a text that read, “you’re dead to me,” and included a copy of the text chain with Leviss as an exhibit. “I did not send the videos to anyone else. Nor did I share, display, or show the videos to anyone else,” Madix wrote. She claimed that Sandoval “forcibly grabbed” her phone a short time later and deleted the videos.

Madix said that “minutes later,” she texted her friend Logan Cochran about what happened and told him she no longer had the videos. “Tom took my phone and deleted them,” she wrote, according to a reproduction of the text chain included as another exhibit.

Her lawyers wrote in her motion that Madix was protected by her constitutional right to free speech when she subsequently discussed the video with family and friends. “Notwithstanding Ms. Madix’s discretion and restraint, plaintiff alleges in the complaint that Ms. Madix should have done absolutely nothing after discovering the messages and sexually explicit video between her life partner and plaintiff. If plaintiff had her way, Ms. Madix would not have told anyone about the affair or the video. But, because Ms. Madix did share such information — as is her right — plaintiff seeks to punish her and blame Ms. Madix for the negative reaction plaintiff received as a result of her affair with Mr. Sandoval,” the new filing states.

With her new motion, Madix is asking a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge to strike all three of the claims lodged against her in the lawsuit: revenge porn, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Sandoval also is facing those three claims in addition to a fourth one for alleged eavesdropping related to the initial recording. Sandoval filed a separate challenge to the lawsuit last week, calling it “vague” and deficient, adding that Leviss’ own conduct was “open and ostentatious” in the context of a voluntary reality TV show scrutinizing her private life.

“The only thing more laughable than the motion itself is the idea that Ariana supposedly just picked up the phone and magically got into it and found this on her way to the bathroom. The whole story is ludicrous,” Leviss’ lawyer Mark Geragos tells Rolling Stone, echoing the suggestion in Leviss’ lawsuit that Madix and Sandoval concocted the video incident to “leverage” the affair for a dramatic storyline for Vanderpump Rules. (In a notable twist, Sandoval’s lawyer is Matthew Geragos, the brother of Mark Geragos. The attorneys are from different law firms.)

In her original 19-page complaint, Leviss, whose real name is Rachel Leviss, claimed that Sandoval “surreptitiously recorded” her “in a state of undress and engaged in sex acts” as they embarked on a romantic relationship purportedly behind the back of Madix. The lawsuit alleged that back in March 2023, Madix took the “sexually explicit videos” obtained from Sandoval’s phone and “distributed them to others” in an alleged act of “revenge porn.”

As fans of the highly addictive Bravo reality show know, video of the FaceTime call is credited with exposing Sandoval and Leviss’ affair, leading to sky-high ratings for the show. According to Madix’s new filing, she found the video on Sandoval’s phone after his device slid out of his pocket while he was performing with his cover band at a club in West Hollywood, Calif. She wrote in her declaration that someone handed her the phone for safekeeping and that her “woman’s intuition” led her to check the device, which she easily accessed because she already knew the code. Madix says she was “shocked” to find a recording of the call while scanning the phone alone in a bathroom stall. “I hurriedly took out my own phone and made two recordings of the FaceTime video. Prior to that moment,
I considered plaintiff a friend and did not know that she and Mr. Sandoval were having an affair,” Madix wrote.

In her lawsuit, Leviss said she found the story of how Madix obtained the video suspect, but she was clear she believed Madix shared the videos with members of the Vanderpump Rules cast as well as people working for the show. “Leviss has suffered grave emotional, psychological, financial and reputational harm as a result of Madix’s distribution, dissemination, and publicization of the illicit videos,” the lawsuit said. Leviss said she was “humiliated and villainized” thanks to the actions of Sandoval and Madix. She accused the pair of acting with “malice,” meaning they should be held liable for punitive damages “to deter such conduct in the future.”

“To be clear, Leviss has repeatedly acknowledged that her actions were morally objectionable and hurtful to Madix. She has offered numerous apologies. There is more to the story, however,” Leviss’ lawsuit said. “Lost in the mix was that Leviss was a victim of the predatory and dishonest behavior of an older man, who recorded sexually explicit videos of her without her knowledge or consent, which were then distributed, disseminated and discussed publicly by a scorned woman seeking vengeance, catalyzing the scandal. Leviss ultimately checked herself into a mental health facility and remained there for three months while Bravo, Evolution and the cast milked the interest her excoriation had peaked.”

Leviss further claimed that she was in a “vulnerable state” while filming for the show and that she was “encouraged” by producers to drink alcohol. Leviss said in her suit that she started sleeping with Sandoval in August 2022, and she claimed that Madix knew about it before she found the video on Sandoval’s phone. She alleges Vanderpump Rules was on the verge of being canceled around this time, as prior plots had “grown stale,” and that Sandoval and Madix “had every incentive” to “leverage” the affair into “the storyline that Vanderpump Rules so desperately needed.”

Madix denies any wrongdoing and is asking not only to be stricken from the lawsuit but for Leviss to cover her related legal fees. The next hearing in the case is set for May 24.

More Stories

Marketer Behind Fake Quotes in ‘Megalopolis’ Trailer Dropped by Lionsgate

Marketer Behind Fake Quotes in ‘Megalopolis’ Trailer Dropped by Lionsgate

Eddie Egan, a very real marketing consultant, lost his gig with Lionsgate this week after the studio discovered that quotes he used in a trailer for Francis Ford Coppola’s Megalopolis were fabricated, according to Variety.

The conceit behind the teaser, which Lionsgate recalled on Wednesday, was that critics had trashed Coppola’s masterpieces throughout the decades, so why trust them? Except that the critics quoted didn’t actually write any of the pith. A quote attributed to Pauline Kael that was said to have run in The New Yorker, claiming The Godfather was “diminished by its artsiness,” never ran.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

Fact Checkers Try to Shield Trump From Project 2025’s Abortion Madness

One of the odder features of American journalism is that the columnists who hold themselves out as “fact checkers” and review claims made by politicians — calling balls, strikes, and “pinocchios” — are unusually terrible at it.

Fact checkers offered up several botched reviews of content from the Democratic National Convention, but nothing has broken their brains like Democrats’ sustained attacks on Donald Trump over Republicans’ anti-abortion agenda, which is laid out in gory detail in conservatives’ Project 2025 policy roadmap. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Cops Who Falsified Warrant Used in Breonna Taylor Raid Didn’t Cause Her Death, Judge Rules

Cops Who Falsified Warrant Used in Breonna Taylor Raid Didn’t Cause Her Death, Judge Rules

A federal judge in Kentucky ruled that two police officers accused of falsifying a warrant ahead of the deadly raid that killed Breonna Taylor were not responsible for her death, The Associated Press reports. And rather than the phony warrant, U.S. District Judge Charles Simpson said Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, was responsible for her death because he fired upon the police officers first — even though he had no idea they were police officers.

The ruling was handed down earlier this week in the civil rights violation case against former Louisville Police Detective Joshua Jaynes and former Sgt. Kyle Meany. The two were not present at the March 2020 raid when Taylor was killed. Instead, in 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland accused the pair (along with another detective, Kelly Goodlett) of submitting a false affidavit to search Taylor’s home before the raid and then conspiring to create a “false cover story… to escape responsibility” for preparing the phony warrant. 

Keep ReadingShow less
Queens of the Stone Age Cancel Remaining 2024 Shows After Josh Homme Surgery

Queens of the Stone Age Cancel Remaining 2024 Shows After Josh Homme Surgery

Queens of the Stone Age have canceled the remainder of their 2024 tour dates — including a string of North American shows and festival gigs scheduled for the fall — as Josh Homme continues his recovery from an unspecified surgery he underwent in July.

“QOTSA regret to announce the cancellation and/or postponement of all remaining 2024 shows. Josh has been given no choice but to prioritize his health and to receive essential medical care through the remainder of the year,” the band wrote on social media.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sabrina Carpenter Is Viscously Clever and Done With Love Triangles on ‘Short N’ Sweet’: 5 Takeaways

Sabrina Carpenter Is Viscously Clever and Done With Love Triangles on ‘Short N’ Sweet’: 5 Takeaways

After Sabrina Carpenter’s summer takeover with “Espresso” and “Please Please Please,” the anticipation for Short n’ Sweet was at an all-time high. On her sixth album, the pop singer keeps the surprises coming as she delivers a masterclass in clever songwriting and hops between R&B and folk-pop with ease. Carpenter writes about the frustration of modern-day romance, all the while cementing herself as a pop classic. Here’s everything we gathered from the new project.

Please Please Please Don’t Underestimate Her Humor

Carpenter gave us a glimpse of her humor on singles “Espresso” and “Please Please Please” — she’s working late because she’s a singer; ceiling fans are a pretty great invention! But no one could have guessed how downright hilarious she is on Short n’ Sweet, delivering sugary quips like “The Lord forgot my gay awakenin’” (“Slim Pickins”) and “How’s the weather in your mother’s basement?” (“Needless to Say”). She’s also adorably nerdy, fretting about grammar (“This boy doesn’t even know/The difference between ‘there,’ ‘their’ and ‘they are!’”) and getting Shakespearian (“Where art thou? Why not uponeth me?”). On “Juno,” she even takes a subject as serious as pregnancy and twists it into a charming pop culture reference for the ages: “If you love me right, then who knows?/I might let you make me Juno.” It’s official: Do not underestimate Ms. Carpenter’s pen. — A.M.

Keep ReadingShow less